Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 30. junij 2025 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CN0293: Case C-293/25, Moguchev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Sofia (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Criminal proceedings against RT CELEX:62025CN0292: Case C-292/25, shopping24: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz (Austria) lodged on 18 April 2025 – shopping24 Gesellschaft für multimediale Anwendung v SR as insolvency practitioner in respect of the assets of Sportgigant Lindpointner GmbH CELEX:62025CN0294: Case C-294/25, AVEPA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 17 April 2025 – UD, VO, GT and KJ, in their own names and as members of the agricultural holding UD e co., BF, in their own name and as owner of the agricultural holding bearing the same name, IJ, BP and LR, in their own names and as members of the agricultural holding IJ, BP e LR s.s. v Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA) Print 18 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025CJ0010_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective.#Case C-10/25. CELEX:62026TO0410: __[no-tr-for:ord-t]__ of 14 August 2026.#UM v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-410/26 R. CELEX:62023CJ0307_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#G GmbH v Hauptzollamt H.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Determining the customs value – Article 32(1)(a)(ii) and (b)(iv) – Adjustment depending on costs incurred by the buyer – Costs arising from intangible services for the design of templates for labels affixed on food cans – Concept of ‘container’ – Intangible services within the European Union.#Case C-307/23. CELEX:62024CJ0408_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24. CELEX:62024CJ0744_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#P.W. v Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(j) – Article 10(2)(f) – The concept of ‘borrowing rate’ – The concept of ‘amount of credit drawn down’ – Article 3(g) – The concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ – Charging interest on an amount corresponding to the cost of the credit – Insurance premium.#Case C-744/24. CELEX:62023CJ0727_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#PB v Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Civil service – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants – Members of the temporary staff – Decision not to reclassify – Possibility for the administration to supplement before the Courts of the European Union the statement of reasons for the decision not to reclassify – Conditions – Exceptional cases – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the subsequent action – Action for annulment.#Case C-727/23 P. CELEX:62024TO0001: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 August 2026.#Kartroi LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Proceedings – Taxation of costs.#Joined Cases T-1/24 DEP and T-47/24 DEP. CELEX:62025CJ0052_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#RZ and Others v Région wallonne.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Aid intended to compensate for damage caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to a natural disaster – Reduction of the amount of aid in the event of failure to take out insurance covering at least 50% of the beneficiary’s average annual production or production-related income and the most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned – Article 25(9) – Impossibility for the beneficiary of the aid to take out the required in CELEX:62024CJ0590_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Criminal proceedings against AK Dlhopolec s.r.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rig CELEX:62025CJ0301_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Lidl Italia Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Scope – Relationship between the provisions of that directive and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices – Article 3(4) – Unfair food information practices – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Whether there is a conflict – Complementary nature of systems of protection.#Case C-301/25. CELEX:62024CJ0489_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Possibility to extend the six-month time limit for taking a decision in the event of a large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Successive extension decisions – Conditions and limits – Article 4(1) – Obligation for Member States to ensure that the determining authority is provided with appropriate means to carry out its tasks.#Case C-489/24. CELEX:62024CJ0210_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Contract for social services without accommodation – Contract with a value below the threshold for that directive to apply – Article 67 – Award criteria of a social nature – Most economically advantageous tender – Salary increase of staff performing the contract above the salary level provided for in the sectoral collective agreement – Connection with the subject matter of the contract – Proportionality and non-discrimination – Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to negotiate by collective agreement.# CELEX:62026CO0278_INF: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P. CELEX:62025TO0844_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026.#Biohaven Bioscience Ireland Ltd and Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-844/25 R. CELEX:62025TJ0030_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#HI v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – 2022 appraisal procedure – Staff report – Impartiality – Duty of care – Protection of personal data – Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-30/25. CELEX:62024TJ0084_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#UU v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-84/24. CELEX:62025TO0505_INF: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 12 mai 2026.#Ivan Sammut contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Prestation de services de traduction – Demande de mesures provisoires – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-505/25 R. CELEX:62024TO0247_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2026.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Request to initiate an investigation – Refusal by EIOPA – Decision of the Board of Appeal to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-247/24. CELEX:62024CJ0899_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#HG v European Commission.#Case C-899/24 P. CELEX:62025TO0214_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.